For all-source analysts

Calibrated intelligence, not confident guesses.

SIGINT, HUMINT, GEOINT, OSINT — twelve systems, one decision-maker. Arkivist fuses sources into a single claim network with calibrated confidence, surfaces contradictions across collection disciplines, and lets coalition partners verify your facts without seeing your collection.

Hedera Anchor · Testnet

Reference corpus

Claims13,278 claims · 956 federal laws
Topic0.0.7911130 · sequence #162
Transaction0.0.7859701@1774756246.373988635
Merkle root51b79c5a…f474
Cost$0.0008

Testnet today. Mainnet this cycle.

The problem

What breaks all-source analysis today.

  • Collection happens in twelve systems. Synthesis happens in an analyst's head — and walks out the door when they rotate.
  • Confidence is asserted, not calibrated. A model says 90% the same way it says 60%. The decision-maker cannot tell the difference.
  • Adversaries seed the same feeds you ingest. Without a notion of what supports what, the substrate cannot tell good data from a plant.
  • Reports are delivered with a single confidence number. The uncertainty bands — and the contradicting source — never make it to the desk.
What Arkivist brings

Substrate. Reasoning. Federation. Applied to your work.

Substrate

Multi-source claim fusion

Every fact arrives with its source class, its provenance chain, and its supporting evidence. The same entity surfacing from SIGINT, GEOINT, and OSINT becomes one node — with three independent corroborations recorded.

Reasoning

Calibrated confidence, not asserted

Agents are scored on their historical accuracy. When they say 0.9, accuracy hits 0.93. When they cannot calibrate, they say so. The decision-maker sees the math, not the marketing.

Reasoning

GOLAG escalation when uncertain

Game-Oriented Lagrangian Agent Governance: agents have finite confidence budgets and pay quadratic costs to vote. Overconfident agents exhaust themselves. Calibrated ones accumulate influence. The system gets smarter by knowing what it does not know.

Reasoning

Contradiction surfacing across sources

Claims that contradict each other are flagged, not averaged. The world is inconsistent. Systems that hide it are lying. Arkivist surfaces the conflict with both sides' evidence.

Federation

Trustless coalition exchange

Share L5-anchored claims with partner services. They verify the chain against a public ledger — Arkivist does not gatekeep verification. Raw collection sovereignty stays at home.

Substrate

Temporal reconstruction

Every claim has a valid-from. Reconstruct exactly what was known on the day of a tasking decision. Audit, after-action, and accountability all become tractable.

The proof

Confidence with a cryptographic floor.

  1. L1Raw
  2. L2Corroborated
  3. L3Verified
  4. L4Expert
  5. L5Anchored

Claims ascend from raw collection through corroboration and calibrated-agent verification to L5 — anchored to the Hedera Consensus Service. Coalition partners verify the anchor themselves; no trust in your database is required. The reasoning trace is auditable end-to-end.

Hedera Anchor · Testnet

Reference corpus

Claims13,278 claims · 956 federal laws
Topic0.0.7911130 · sequence #162
Transaction0.0.7859701@1774756246.373988635
Merkle root51b79c5a…f474
Cost$0.0008

Testnet today. Mainnet this cycle.

Federation

Coalition partners share facts, not feeds.

Verified facts, not raw data

Partner services need your conclusions, not your collection. Arkivist exchanges L5-anchored claims with full provenance and confidence calibration — verifiable independently by the receiving service. Your sources, methods, and rawintel never leave your tenant. Cryptographic trust replaces institutional liaison.

Run the substrate against one collection problem.

A scoped pilot on a defined target set. We will not promise omniscience. We will show calibrated, traceable answers — and where the substrate says it does not know.