For general counsel and matter teams
Every cite resolves. Every contradiction surfaces.
eDiscovery returns fifty thousand documents; relevance is opinion until someone proves it. LLM-generated citations are sometimes invented. Privileged material slips into productions. Matter knowledge dies when the associate leaves. Arkivist gives each matter a knowledge graph with citation validation, contradiction surfacing across exhibits, and privilege containment by tenant boundary — not by policy.
Hedera Anchor · Testnet
Canadian Federal Corpus
Testnet today. Mainnet this cycle.
What breaks legal work today.
- eDiscovery spits out fifty thousand documents. Relevance is opinion until it is proven. The proof lives in someone's notebook, not the system.
- LLM-generated citations are sometimes invented. A brief built on a hallucinated case is malpractice — discovered late, defended badly.
- Privileged material leaks into productions. Tenant boundaries are paper. Privilege is policy, not architecture.
- Matter knowledge dies when the associate leaves. The successor inherits documents, not understanding.
- Contradictions between exhibits sit buried until trial — and then they become opposing counsel's opening statement.
Substrate. Reasoning. Federation. Applied to your work.
Citation-validated brief generation
Every cite a draft produces is resolved against a real source. Invented citations are refused, not hidden. The associate sees what the model could verify — and what it could not.
Matter-scoped knowledge graph
Each matter gets its own substrate — entities, claims, relationships, and the full provenance chain. The knowledge persists past staffing changes; the successor inherits a graph, not a folder.
Contradiction detection across exhibits
Symbolic reasoning surfaces conflicts between deposition transcripts, document productions, and prior statements — flagged for the matter lead before trial, not by opposing counsel during it.
Privilege by tenant boundary
Privileged material is contained by architecture. Row-level security and tenant isolation prevent privileged claims from being seen, queried, or aggregated outside the matter. Not a policy. A boundary.
Temporal reconstruction for matter timelines
Every claim has a valid-from. Reconstruct what was known on a specific date — what the client knew, what counsel knew, when. Audit-grade timelines without spreadsheet reconstruction.
Structured co-counsel sharing
Share verified facts with co-counsel or outside counsel as L5-anchored claims with provenance — not raw productions. Each party verifies the anchor independently. Sovereignty preserved across the matter team.
From a draft brief to a verifiable filing.
- L1Raw
- L2Corroborated
- L3Verified
- L4Expert
- L5Anchored
Claims rise from raw extraction through corroboration and agent verification to L5 — anchored to the Hedera Consensus Service. The chain from exhibit to citation is structural; an opposing party or court can verify the chain against a ledger Arkivist does not control.
Hedera Anchor · Testnet
Canadian Federal Corpus
Testnet today. Mainnet this cycle.
Co-counsel share facts. Privileged material stays home.
Verified facts, not raw data
Outside counsel, co-counsel, and clients today exchange productions, indices, and emails. Arkivist replaces that with structured sharing of verified facts — L5-anchored claims with provenance, verifiable independently by the receiving party. Raw documents, work product, and privileged material never leave the originating tenant. Collaboration without privilege exposure.
Bring proof into the matter.
A pilot scoped to one active matter — citation validation, contradiction surfacing, and a matter graph the successor team can inherit on day one.