For AML, fraud, and risk teams
Every regulator-facing claim, sourced.
SAR-on-vibes does not survive a regulator's questioning. Fraud rings span entities, accounts, and jurisdictions — tooling sees one row at a time. Arkivist resolves entities across your data, traces every claim back to source, and lets institutions share verified facts through cryptographic federation — not forwarded PDFs.
Hedera Anchor · Testnet
Reference corpus
Testnet today. Mainnet this cycle.
What breaks compliance today.
- Suspicious-activity filings built on LLM-generated summaries get rejected. The regulator wants the chain; the chain is a narrative, not a record.
- Fraud rings cross entities, accounts, and jurisdictions. Today's tooling sees a single row. The ring is invisible until it is too large to miss.
- Regulators ask “how did you know?” The right answer is a provenance graph, not a screenshot of a model's output.
- LLM-generated summaries cited as evidence are dangerous when they hallucinate. Hallucinations in this domain are findings, fines, and consent orders.
Substrate. Reasoning. Federation. Applied to your work.
Entity resolution across the institution
The same beneficial owner across accounts, jurisdictions, and product lines becomes one entity in the knowledge graph — with every supporting record preserved. The ring becomes visible.
Audit-grade claim provenance
Every claim — every line in a SAR, every flag on a transaction — resolves to its source artefacts and the agent chain that promoted it. The audit trail is structural, not narrative.
Temporal and contradiction reasoning
Transactions are time-stamped facts. Arkivist reasons about valid-from and valid-to, surfaces contradictions across statements and filings, and flags conflicts to the compliance officer before they become findings.
Hallucination refusal
Citations must resolve to a real source. Invented references are refused, not hidden. The compliance officer sees what the model knows — and what it could not verify.
Cryptographic 314(b)-style sharing
Institutions exchange L5-anchored claims with full provenance. The receiving party verifies against a public ledger Arkivist does not control. Real-time information sharing without inter-bank trust assumptions.
Time-travel for examiners
Reconstruct exactly what the institution knew on the date of a transaction or decision. Same query, different timestamp, different answer. The examiner sees the state of knowledge as it was, not as it is.
From a flag to a verifiable filing.
- L1Raw
- L2Corroborated
- L3Verified
- L4Expert
- L5Anchored
Claims rise from raw extraction through corroboration and agent verification to L5 — anchored to the Hedera Consensus Service. A regulator or examining institution verifies the anchor against a public ledger. The chain of custody is cryptographic, not institutional.
Hedera Anchor · Testnet
Reference corpus
Testnet today. Mainnet this cycle.
Institutions share facts. Raw books stay home.
Verified facts, not raw data
Inter-institution information sharing under 314(b) and equivalent regimes today depends on telephone, email, and goodwill. Arkivist replaces that with verifiable exchange — L5-anchored facts flow between institutions; each side verifies the anchor cryptographically; raw transaction data, KYC files, and beneficial-ownership records never leave their tenant. Faster, auditable, and sovereign.
Bring proof into the SAR.
A pilot scoped to a single line of business and a single regulator-facing process. You see the substrate; your team sees its work, with the audit trail already built.